FOSTER v. FOSTER, No. 33301 (Per Curiam)(November 20, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Raleigh County that determined that a petition to recover overpayment of just under $3,500 in child support was filed outside the statute of limitations. Declining to reverse on grounds asserted, instead applying the equitable doctrine of unclean hands to preclude recovery, where the appellee was previously able to avoid paying over $30,000 in child support by successfully asserting that the appellant was barred from collecting on the decretal judgment that was more than ten years old.

CHILD SUPPORT ENF. DIV. and VARNEY v. VARNEY, No. 33332 (Per Curiam)(Maynard, J., disqualified)(Janes, Judge, by temporary assignment)(November 21, 2007). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Mingo County that denied an appeal from a family court order that determined the statute of limitations applies to bar a suit to enforce a decretal judgment for alimony arrearages. Holding that because a writ of execution was issued within the ten-year statute of limitations attached to the decretal judgment, the statute began to run anew from the return day of the execution.

HELFER v. HELFER, No. 33348 (Per Curiam)(November 8, 2007)(Rehearing denied, January 10, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Ohio County that denied a petition for appeal from a family court order regarding equitable distribution. Holding that the family court in failing to take into account the intangible asset of enterprise goodwill in the chiropractic practice. Remanding for further proceedings.

GUIDO v. GUIDO, No. 33599 (Per Curiam)(Albright, J., and Starcher, J., dissenting)(June 18, 2008). Affirming an order of the Circuit Court of Marion County that denied a petition for appeal from a decretal judgment for child support arrearages in the total amount of $22,767.17, on the basis that the petition was not properly completed. Holding that the requirement of service in W.Va. Code 51-2A-11(b) is mandatory, and that lack of a certificate of service upon the obligee and the Bureau for Child Support Enforcement is violation of a mandatory requirement, not a mere technical violation of procedural rules.

SOULSBY v. SOULSBY, No. 33661 (DAVIS, J.)(April 4, 2008). Granting mixed relief from an order of the Circuit Court of Putnam County that denied a petition for appeal from a family court order setting child support. Holding that the family court has authority to deviate from the statutory child support guidelines in certain circumstances. Holding that strict application of the child support guidelines results in an inequitable result where, as here, one parent has physical custody of two children, but the children are governed by two separate parenting arrangements. Holding that the child support obligation should be reduced by the percentage of time spent by the obligor parent under the extended shared parenting arrangement. Strongly urging the Legislature to provide guidance on this issue.

IN RE: SUMMER D., No. 33386 (Per Curiam)(February 26, 2008). Reversing an order of the Circuit Court of Brooke County that denied a motion by the guardian ad litem to amend an abuse & neglect petition. Holding that the circuit court erred in denying the motion to amend, because reasonable cause to believe additional abuse and neglect is imminent, but not encompassed by the allegations of the petition. Holding that the record is insufficient to determine the ability of the father to parent the child. Remanding for further proceedings.

Posted today were summaries of each of the 66 opinions issued in the January 2008 term of court, comprising 26 signed opinions and 40 per curiam opinions.
CASES HELD OVER: Four cases submitted for decision in the January 2008 term of court were held over, with an opinion to issue during the September term. Those cases are: (1) SAVARESE v. ALLSTATE INS. CO., No. 33443(Argued January 23, 2008); (2) RASHID v. TARAKJI, No. 33596 (Argued April 1, 2008); (3) STATE EX REL. HATFIELD v. PAINTER, No. 33668 (Argued April 16, 2008); (4) LAWYER DISC. BD. v. WILLIAM H. DUTY, No. 33069, (Original opinion withdrawn when the Court granted a petition for rehearing. The case was re-argued on May 25, 2008. Thereafter, Chief Justice Maynard recused himself from the case, and the case will be set for a second re-argument in the September term.)

IN RE: SAMANTHA S. AND HOPE S., No. 33713 (Per Curiam)(Sept. 26, 2008). Granting mixed relief from an order of the Circuit Court of Mingo County that terminated parental rights and awarded physical custody to the paternal grandparents. Holding that the circuit court correctly terminated parental rights and awarded custody to the paternal grandparents. Holding that the circuit court erred in granting unsupervised visitation to the maternal grandparents, and remanding for entry of an order terminating the visitation rights of the maternal grandparents.

Summaries of the first seven opinions issued in the September 2008 term of court were posted today. One opinion, Savarese v. Allstate, resolved a case that was argued in the January term of court. Unless otherwise stated, in all opinions issued this term, Justice Albright is not participating and Senior Status Justice McHugh is sitting by temporary assignment.
The final day of arguments in the September term of court is Tuesday, October 29.

The first six opinions of the September 2007 term of court were released today, and are available at this link.